Combined circular external fixation and open reduction internal fixation with pro-syndesmotic screws for repair of a diabetic ankle fracture

CASE REPORT

Combined circular external fixation and open reduction internal fixation with pro-syndesmotic screws for repair of a diabetic ankle fracture

Zacharia Facaros, DPM1, Crystal L. Ramanujam, DPM2 and John J. Stapleton, DPM, FACFAS3,4*

1Fellow, Reconstructive Foot and Ankle Surgery and Clinical Instructor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; 2Fellow, Postgraduate Research and Clinical Instructor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; 3Associate, Foot and Ankle Surgery, VSAS Orthopaedics, Allentown, PA, USA; 4Clinical Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

Abstract

The surgical management of ankle fractures among the diabetic population is associated with higher complication rates compared to the general population. Efforts toward development of better methods in prevention and treatment are continuously evolving for these injuries. The presence of peripheral neuropathy and the possible development of Charcot neuroarthropathy in this high risk patient population have stimulated much surgical interest to create more stable osseous constructs when open reduction of an ankle fracture/dislocation is required. The utilization of multiple syndesmotic screws (pro-syndesmotic screws) to further stabilize the ankle mortise has been reported by many foot and ankle surgeons. In addition, transarticular Steinmann pins have been described as an adjunct to traditional open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) of the ankle to better stabilize the talus, thus minimizing risk of further displacement, malunion, and Charcot neuroarthropathy. The authors present a unique technique of ORIF with pro-syndesmotic screws and the application of a multi-plane circular external fixator for management of a neglected diabetic ankle fracture that prevented further deformity while allowing a weight-bearing status. This techniqu may be utilized for the management of complex diabetic ankle fractures that are prone to future complications and possible limb loss.

Keywords: revisional foot and ankle surgery; diabetes; Charcot neuroarthropathy; trauma-external fixation; complications

Received: 24 August 2010; Revised: 6 September 2010; Accepted: 19 September 2010; Published: 18 October 2010

Citation: Diabetic Foot & Ankle 2010, 1: 5554 - DOI: 10.3402/dfa.v1i0.5554

Diabetic Foot & Ankle 2010. © 2010 Zacharia Facaros et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Introduction

Due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes combined with longer life expectancies of the population, foot and ankle surgeons are frequently faced with the challenge of treating ankle fractures among patients with multiple comorbidities (1–8). Increased complication rates exist for both non-operative and operative management of diabetic ankle fractures; therefore, patients treated for such injuries should be informed of the risks. Wound healing problems, malunion, delayed or non-union, infection, and Charcot neuroarthropathy are among the most common sequelae. In an effort to reduce complications by increasing rigidity of fixation for operatively indicated fractures, several techniques have been reported including longer plates (9), supplementary Kirschner wires in plated fibulas (10), multiple fibula–tibia syndesmotic screws (11–15), locked plating (16), transcalcaneal-tibia pin fixation (17), and circular external fixation (7, 15). The authors present a case demonstrating a novel surgical approach combining ORIF with pro-syndesmotic screws and circular external fixation for a diabetic ankle fracture. This technique can provide surgeons with a viable option when faced with treating certain complicated diabetic ankle fractures.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old male presented to the outpatient clinic with a chief complaint of ambulatory difficulty and a history of an ankle fracture and deformity. The patient's daughter reported that her father sustained an ankle fracture 6 weeks ago and was hospitalized. The history revealed that the patient was placed in a short-leg cast and surgery was considered but not performed since the ankle mortise was reduced at that time and the patient's ankle displayed multiple fracture blisters. The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility during which time the cast was removed secondary to non-compliance and skin compromise. The patient's daughter stated that her father was fully ambulatory at 2 weeks after the initial injury despite medical advice. Unfortunately, he was unaware of his ankle fracture since he suffered from dementia and Alzheimer's disease. His medical history was also significant for poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, prior alcohol abuse, seizures, aortic stenosis, meningioma, and hypertension. A physical examination revealed a well-nourished individual who was in no acute distress and was alert but not oriented to time, person, or place. His vital signs were stable. The left lower extremity was edematous with a non-infected necrotic wound over the medial malleolus. The ankle and rearfoot displayed severe valgus deformity with the medial malleolus causing pressure necrosis to the overlying soft tissue. He had weakly palpable pulses and loss of protective sensation when examined with a 5.07 Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Radiographic evaluation revealed a displaced fibula fracture with significant ankle joint subluxation and widening of the medial clear space (Fig. 1). The patient was admitted to the hospital and stratified as moderate risk for surgical intervention after optimized by both internal medicine and cardiology.


Fig. 1.  Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographic views immediately following the initial injury showing a minimally displaced fibula shaft fracture in a diabetic patient with peripheral neuropathy. Anteroposterior (C) and lateral (D) radiographic views 6 weeks following initial injury and upon initial presentation to the treating physician's office demonstrating a displaced fibula shaft fracture with ankle joint subluxation.

Non-invasive vascular studies that consisted of ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, and pulse volume recordings demonstrated moderate arterial occlusive disease with a falsely elevated ankle-brachial index secondary to calcified vessels. The patient was then evaluated by vascular surgery and after angiography was performed, adequate collateral circulation was present and their recommendation was to proceed with appropriate surgical intervention. The patient was brought to the operating room after obtaining informed consent from his daughter, as he was deemed not competent to make his own medical decisions. The patient underwent operative intervention that consisted of ORIF of his fibula fracture with placement of multiple pro-syndesmotic screws and application of a multi-plane circular external fixator. Postoperatively, the patient was permitted to fully weight-bear with the external fixator and discharged to a rehabilitation facility. The patient developed a postoperative infection that was evident 3 weeks after surgery, as wound dehiscence and drainage were apparent. The patient was readmitted to the hospital for inpatient care. The patient was brought back to the operating theater during this admission for an incision and drainage of the ankle wound with collection of deep intra-operative soft tissue cultures and reclosure of the wound over a drain. The drain was removed at 72 h and then wet to dry dressings were applied daily until the wound was healed. Deep intra-operative cultures grew methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The patient was initially placed on parenteral administration of Vancomycin but was switched to oral administration of Zyvox after the first week as the patient continued to remove his peripherally inserted central catheter line. His antibiotic regimen was continued 6 weeks for treatment of deep infection with retained hardware. The patient healed his wound at 6 weeks postoperatively and was full weight-bearing with the external fixator for 12 weeks total time.

The external fixator was removed and the patient was placed into a walking total contact cast for a total of 6 weeks with cast changes performed at 2 week intervals. The patient was able to resume full ambulatory status with prefabricated extra-depth diabetic shoes with soft inlays at 18 weeks postoperatively. The patient continued to maintain an ambulatory status with no further complications at his 8-month follow-up (Fig. 2).


Fig. 2.  Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) 4-week postoperative radiographs, a combination of circular external fixation and ORIF with pro-syndesmotic screws was performed for repair. Anteroposterior (C) and lateral (D) 8-month postoperative radiographs, the ankle mortise was well maintained with no evidence of hardware failure or Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Technical considerations

An ORIF of the fibula with placement of multiple pro-syndesmotic screws was first performed in routine fashion. The external fixation construct consisted of two tibia rings, a talus ring, and a foot plate. The construct was pre-built and positioned to the lower leg and foot by placing surgical towels on the posterior aspect of the lower leg and heel. The tibia segment was secured with a frontal plane and medial face smooth wires that were tensioned to 130 kgf, generating an estimated force of 1275 N. Two opposing olive wires were utilized to stabilize the calcaneus and tensioned to 90 kgf, generating an estimated force of 887 N, after being attached to the foot plate. A smooth wire was also placed into the midfoot and forefoot and tensioned by hand after being attached to the foot plate. The next step consisted of the placement of three olive wires that were placed to prevent further valgus forces across the ankle joint. Two olive wires were placed in the tibia from medial to lateral, approximately 10 and 15 cm, respectively, from the ankle joint and tensioned to 90 kgf after being attached to two straight plates that extended from the tibia segment.

An additional olive wire was placed from lateral to medial across the body of the talus and tensioned to 90 kgf after being fastened to the talus ring. The authors believe the technique consisting of these last three olive wires offered tremendous stability and control of the talus while preventing medial displacement of the tibia as the patient resumed a weight-bearing status. The remaining construct of the proximal tibia block and foot plate offered static osseous stabilization of the foot and leg. A full circular ring and a shoe were attached to the foot plate to allow the patient the ability to walk safely with the external fixation device.

Discussion

Successful ORIF of ankle fractures among diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy can be challenging (1–5, 18). The authors’ combination of ORIF with pro-syndesmotic screws and circular external fixation provides a stable, rigid construct that is capable of maintaining fracture reduction while also allowing weight-bearing through the postoperative healing course. Long-term outcomes including complication rates, functional evaluation, and limb survivability must be assessed amidst these new techniques for management of diabetic ankle fractures to determine if they are truly worthwhile and advantageous. Minimally invasive fracture reduction and stabilization with internal fixation combined with external fixation is often utilized in lower extremity fracture patterns that have high risk of soft tissue complications (19, 20).

Conclusion

Early recognition and a treatment plan that considers the anticipation of potential complications are paramount to the peri-operative management of diabetic ankle fractures. This article presents a novel technique that may be beneficial for the management of select ‘high risk’ diabetic ankle fractures.

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.

References

  1. Thordarson DB. Ankle fractures in diabetics. Techniques Foot Ankle Surg 2004; 3: 192–7. [Crossref]
  2. McCormack RG, Leith JM. Ankle fractures in diabetics. Complications of surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 689–92. [Crossref]
  3. Jones KB, Maiers-Yelden KA, Marsh JL, Zimmerman MB, Estin M, Saltzman CL. Ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 489–95. [Crossref]
  4. Costigan W, Thordarson DB, Debnath UK. Operative management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28: 32–7. [Crossref]
  5. Wukich DK, Kline AJ. The management of ankle fractures in patients with diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1570–8. [Crossref]
  6. Lindsjö U. Operative treatment of ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 189: 1–131.
  7. Zgonis T, Stapleton JJ, Polyzois VD, Sella EJ. Revisional and reconstructive surgery for the diabetic foot and ankle. In: Zgonis T, ed., Surgical reconstruction of the diabetic foot and ankle. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009, pp. 315–43.
  8. Padanilam TG, Donley BG. High-risk foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Clin N Am 2003; 8: 149–57. [Crossref]
  9. Sanders R, Haidukewych GJ, Milne T, Dennis J, Latta LL. Minimal versus maximal plate fixation techniques of the ulna: the biomechanical effect of number of screws and plate length. J Orthop Trauma 2002; 16: 166–71. [Crossref]
  10. Koval KJ, Petraco DM, Kummer FJ, Bharam S. A new technique for complex fibula fracture fixation in the elderly: a clinical and biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 28–33. [Crossref]
  11. Van den Bekerom MP, Lamme B, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW. Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization. J Foot Ankle Surg 2007; 46: 456–63. [Crossref]
  12. Fanter NJ, Inouye SE, McBryde AM, Jr. Safety of ankle trans-syndesmotic fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2010; 31: 433–40. [Crossref]
  13. Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P, Lestini WF, Hurwitz SR. Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1548–55.
  14. Perry MD, Taranow WS, Manoli A, II, Carr JB. Salvage of failed neuropathic ankle fractures: use of large fragment fibular plating and multiple syndesmotic screws. J Surg Orthop Adv 2005; 14: 85–91.
  15. Dunn WR, Easley ME, Parks BG, Trnka HJ, Schon LC. An augmented fixation method for distal fibular fractures in elderly patients: a biomechanical evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25: 128–31.
  16. Müller S, Wenz W. Preserving foot surgery for diabetics. Orthopade 2009; 38: 1171–9. [Crossref]
  17. Jani MM, Ricci WM, Borrelli J, Jr, Barrett SE, Johnson JE. A protocol for treatment of unstable ankle fractures using transarticular fixation in patients with diabetes mellitus and loss of protective sensibility. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 838–44.
  18. Ganesh SP, Peitrobon R, Cecílio WA, Pan D, Lightdale N, Nunley JA. The impact of diabetes on patient outcomes after ankle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1712–8. [Crossref]
  19. Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Elliott B, Stockenhuber N, Peicha G. External fixation in trauma of the foot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2003; 20: 159–80. [Crossref]
  20. DiDomenico LA, Brown D, Zgonis T. The use of Ilizarov technique as a definitive percutaneous reduction for ankle fractures in patients who have diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2009; 26: 141–8. [Crossref]

*John J. Stapleton
Foot and Ankle Surgery
VSAS Orthopaedics
1250 South Cedar Crest Blvd. Suite 110
Allentown, PA 18103, USA
Email: Jostaple@hotmail.com

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Bookmark and Share


Diabetic Foot & Ankle eISSN 2000-625X

This journal is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License.